Does man made snow carry less toxins then nature's snow
Hypothesis
I hypothesis that the man made snow carry's less toxins
Graph of Hypothesis
Variables
Independent Variable:
choice of snow
Dependent Variable:
toxins
Variables That Need To Be Controlled:
mountain
sample container
woods/open area
Vocabulary List That Needs Explanation
General Plan
For my project I am comparing the amount of toxin in natural snow to man made snow.I am going to collect snow from a ski mountain and an untouched mountain and melt down the snow.Then I am going to take a paper filter and a funnel. I am going to dump the water into the filter with the funnel and after all the water went through I will then take the paper from the two melted snow samples and weigh the differences for the most bacteria I then take two more samples and have them measured in a lab. After this I will check my hypothesis and get my answer.
Potential Problems And Solutions
1.Dirt might drift into the snow
2.The filter and funnel might be dirty
3.If i touch the snow with my hannds it could contaminate it
the data will be collected in my science class room, and at my house in my kitchen
Resources and Budget Table
Item
Number needed
Where I will get this
Cost
paper filter
10
school
?
funnel
1
home
0
plastic pluming pipe
2
home depot
20
snow
2 pounds
mountain
0
scale
1
school
0
Detailed Procedure
1. I am going to go to go to a ski mountain and a normal mountain
2.Then I am going to take a sample from each mountain by pushing a pluming pipe down and pulling snow out with it
3. I will then need to extract snow from the piping without touching it with my hands so i don't contaminate it
4. Then I will take the snow, melt it down, and run it through a funnel with a paper filter
5. I do this with both the snow samples with two different filters
6.Then I do that nine more times Diagram
Photo List
1. me at the mountain
2. me at the ski mountain
3. the two snow samples
4. picture of me sampling snow
5. me filtering melted snow
6.drying the snow
7. weighing the dried filter 8.making the graph
9. graphing data
10. finnish project
Time Line
procedure/photo list complete- 2/1
begin experiments no later then-2/4
experiments done- 3/1
analysis- 3/7
discussion/background- 3/15
posters complete- 3/22
K.M.S. fair-3/29
Data Table
variables
container
woods/open area
toxins
Data Analysis
All Raw Data
I originally planned non doing ph(acididy) but the levels of ph were extrodinarilly low and I was
forced to look for a differant element and setled on alkalinity.
my results are that my hypothesis was wrong about man-made snow carrying
less toxins. It maxed out in the alkalinity tests and the natural was really low.On the
other hand the natural snow was higher in pH then the man made was.
Conclusion
I conclude that man-made snow carry more toxins then nature's snow. it will
not hurt you if you eat snow but it does carry more unhealthier toxins then natures
snow.I reject my hypothesis e and i hypothesis that when the snow from the ski
mountain and the natural snow mix, they actually filter each other out and and are cleaner.
Discussion
In my science my project i did not-is a slight pattern of the data, the man-made snow always
had a higher alkalinity level then the natural snow. I got the answer I needed and was successful
Table of Contents
Title
Dirty SnowProblem Scenario
does man made snow at ski mountains carry lessBroad Question
is snow unhealthySpecific Question
Does man made snow carry less toxins then nature's snowHypothesis
I hypothesis that the man made snow carry's less toxinsGraph of Hypothesis
Variables
Independent Variable:
choice of snowDependent Variable:
toxinsVariables That Need To Be Controlled:
mountainsample container
woods/open area
Vocabulary List That Needs Explanation
General Plan
For my project I am comparing the amount of toxin in natural snow to man made snow.I am going to collect snow from a ski mountain and an untouched mountain and melt down the snow.Then I am going to take a paper filter and a funnel. I am going to dump the water into the filter with the funnel and after all the water went through I will then take the paper from the two melted snow samples and weigh the differences for the most bacteria I then take two more samples and have them measured in a lab. After this I will check my hypothesis and get my answer.Potential Problems And Solutions
1.Dirt might drift into the snow2.The filter and funnel might be dirty
3.If i touch the snow with my hannds it could contaminate it
Safety Or Environmental Concerns
Experimental Design
(add the correct headings from the experimental design page before beginning)Number Of Comparison Categories:
2, natural and man-made snowNumber of Comparison Samples:
10, 5 natural and 5 man-madeNumber Of Observation In Each Sample:
5 observationsWhen data will be collected
march,11, 2013Where will data be collected?:
the data will be collected in my science class room, and at my house in my kitchenResources and Budget Table
Detailed Procedure
1. I am going to go to go to a ski mountain and a normal mountain2.Then I am going to take a sample from each mountain by pushing a pluming pipe down and pulling snow out with it
3. I will then need to extract snow from the piping without touching it with my hands so i don't contaminate it
4. Then I will take the snow, melt it down, and run it through a funnel with a paper filter
5. I do this with both the snow samples with two different filters
6.Then I do that nine more times
Diagram
Photo List
1. me at the mountain2. me at the ski mountain
3. the two snow samples
4. picture of me sampling snow
5. me filtering melted snow
6.drying the snow
7. weighing the dried filter
8.making the graph
9. graphing data
10. finnish project
Time Line
procedure/photo list complete- 2/1begin experiments no later then-2/4
experiments done- 3/1
analysis- 3/7
discussion/background- 3/15
posters complete- 3/22
K.M.S. fair-3/29
Data Table
Data Analysis
All Raw Data
I originally planned non doing ph(acididy) but the levels of ph were extrodinarilly low and I wasforced to look for a differant element and setled on alkalinity.
Alkalinity level
natural
1.high,250
2.high,250
3.high,250
4.high,250
5.low,100
man-made
1.very high,1000
2.very high,1000
3.very high,1000
4.very high,1000
5.very high,1000
ph levels
man-made
1. 6.87
2.6.59
3.6.69
4.6.66
5.6.50
natural
1.6.76
2.6.95
3.6.69
4.6.82
5.6.63
Graphs
Photos
Results
my results are that my hypothesis was wrong about man-made snow carryingless toxins. It maxed out in the alkalinity tests and the natural was really low.On the
other hand the natural snow was higher in pH then the man made was.
Conclusion
I conclude that man-made snow carry more toxins then nature's snow. it will
not hurt you if you eat snow but it does carry more unhealthier toxins then natures
snow.I reject my hypothesis e and i hypothesis that when the snow from the ski
mountain and the natural snow mix, they actually filter each other out and and are cleaner.
Discussion
In my science my project i did not-is a slight pattern of the data, the man-made snow alwayshad a higher alkalinity level then the natural snow. I got the answer I needed and was successful
Benefit to Community and/or Science
Background Research
References
Abstract